Saturday 30 April 2022

2022 Rereads (so far)

Tastes change. Perspectives change. Things once missed become so obvious now. And you wonder: "What happened?" and "What the hell was that?!" and "What the hell was I thinking back then?!"

Times change.

People change.

Or sometimes they don't. Not drastically, anyway. Sometimes things can continue to be loved and appreciated, by the older and wiser reader/viewer.

Nostalgia isn't always blind.

It all depends on the subject, and the content.



See my 2022 rereads and rereviews of the following:






























Saturday 16 April 2022

Graphic Novel Review - 'Salt Magic' by Hope Larson (Writer), Rebecca Mock (Artist)

Another recent witchy fantasy graphic novel, and again I don't get it.

'Salt Magic', in my opinion, is a boring, confusing, poorly thought out, poorly paced, and poorly structured mess. Weirdness and surrealism should not equal something this befuddling and awkward. There's no fantasy element to it at all until over 50 pages in; up to then it's just a dull historical fiction book starring an annoying little brat for a protagonist and her growing older siblings. Said protagonist (I really can't be bothered to remember her name, or any of the characters' names) keeps making mad, sudden decisions, and jumping to conclusions, and trusting people, including witches who very clearly want to either kill her, drain her life, or eat her, or all of the above!

The ending is a random and out of nowhere slight to the protag and the book as a whole, as well. Like, WTF?

Lots of random huhs?whats? and whys? keep happening in 'Salt Magic'. It's hard to keep count. WTF? could apply to the rest of it.

It is also yet another woman scorned story, where the female villain is evil because men broke her heart.

The artwork doesn't appeal to me, either.

Oh. Is it supposed to be a retelling of 'The Snow Queen', set in Oklahoma and the Southern US deserts in the 19th-to-early 20th century? It's so vague, but I might just be reaching.

In conclusion, I unfortunately don't care for this one. It's sad because I have great admiration and respect for Hope Larson.

Oh well, can't win them all.

Final Score: 1/5

Graphic Novel Review - 'Life of Melody' by Mari Costa

Yet another disappointing fantasy and fairy tale graphic novel read. Great concept, the messiest of executions.

Why are there so many of these modern graphic novels that are underdeveloped, poorly structured, and confusing?



Premise/blurb:

Two (supernatural) men and a baby.

In the fairy realm, a Fairy Godparent is tasked with fulfilling fairy tales in the human world. The human protagonist's own motivations and wishes are of little consequences to the fairy working their case. As such, humans are regarded as pretty difficult to work with by the fairies, who otherwise don't seem to know much about them. The fairy Razzmatazz decides that the perfect solution to get around how unaccommodating humans can be is to raise the fairy tale protagonist from infancy to her 18th birthday. Despite his superiors telling him the idea is completely crazy, he commits to it, and by extension, commits to becoming co-parent with a beast named Bon, who found the child at the same time as him.



Razzmatazz and Bon, disguised as humans via glamour, fake being married in the human world, where they raise baby Melody, in spite of and because of each other. They grow to love each other for real in the process. Supposedly.



Problems:

Bizarrely, throughout reading 'Life Of Melody' I regularly forgot that Melody existed. She's not a character; she's a nonentity. Yeah, she's a baby, with not much of a personality to be formed yet, but she should have a presence! She's barely even a plot device to drive and develop Razz and Bon's relationship. This in a book titled 'Life of Melody'. It's not about her or her life.

Melody's birth parents and their possible whereabouts are only brought up once, and then that potential development is completely dropped. Like many ideas and developments in the graphic novel.

I never bought that Razz and Bon ever really liked each other, much less genuinely love one another. Even for a romantic comedy, and even for a haters-to-lovers romance, they are dysfunctional, to the point of being abusive towards each other. There are a few instances of physical violence. And blood. 85% of the graphic novel, they can't stand the other; being together is more trouble than it's worth to them. It's unfortunate because, with better, breezier writing, I could see them being adorable together, to go with their equally potentially adorable characters.

What is up with Razz suddenly having fangs, claws and red eyes near the beginning? Where it's revealed that...what, he's not fully a fairy? This is never brought up again. I kept waiting for it, for a payoff, for it to go somewhere. For Razz's dark side to reappear. For him to form a connection with the beastly Bon based on that, as it was set up to look like that was where it was going. But it didn't.

It doesn't come back. It goes nowhere.

On the subject of discarded character traits, and randomly-introduced-far-too-late character traits, Bon has a third eye. On his forehead, that he has allegedly always had. How? Why? No explanation. It was never noticeable before, and the reader is not made aware of it until near the end of the book. The eye lets him see into people's memories. Plot wise, this only exists to instigate the final conflict between Bon and Razz.

The ending is rushed as hell, too. Too many things happen at once, too quickly, too conveniently, and out of the blue.

Deus ex machinas abound.

Another random character trait added in that they've-always-had-just-take-our-word-for-it: Razz's musical instrument playing. I had to go back to the comic to remind myself that it is the piano he plays! How ridiculous is that?

SHOW DON'T TELL!

There's no solid sense of how much time passes, either. While still in the "first act", as it were, dialogue says that a few months have passed since Razz and Bon have lived together. Then Melody grows old enough to speak words, walk, and even skate. She's the story's unintended time indicator. The main couple themselves don't grow and develop significantly; at least, not until the last few pages. Of the stupidly rushed ending.


Spoiler below:


Do Razzmatazz and Bon seriously both become human at the end, when they finally reconcile and love each other? The LBGTQ couple have to change fundamental parts of themselves - no, their species' -and give up everything about themselves, including where they came from, in order to live in peace together and raise Melody, in an already fantastical setting? What kind of twisted message is that? What about their families back home? AND WHAT ABOUT RAZZMATAZZ'S MONSTROUS SIDE!? WHAT WAS THAT ONE TIME POINTLESSNESS!?


Spoiler end.



'Life of Melody' is a funny and sweet anecdotal comic in some places. But overall it is a cobbled together, messy piece of random stuff happening, with barely any rhyme, reason or explanation.

It's a shame. It had amazing spices, and a fairy dust, of potential.

Final Score: 2/5

Graphic Novel Review - 'The Last Witch (The Last Witch #1-5)' by Conor McCreery (Writer), V.V. Glass (Artist), Natalia Nesterenko (Colourist), Jim Campbell (Letterer)

Spoilers ahead.



As an avid fan of fantasy, fantasy heroines, magical girls, and witches, after reading 'The Last Witch', I have to say...

I don't get it.

I really don't.

Why do so many people like this? It is severely underdeveloped, even for a supposed start of an ongoing series. There are plot holes galore, it is predictable, poorly planned and structured, and to top it off, it is almost shamelessly unoriginal.

Apart from it being virtually no different from any other seemingly-ordinary-girl-discovers-she's-magical-and-is-in-fact-the-most-powerful-witch-ever-and-only-she-can-stop-the-big-bad-evil-from-taking-over-the-world story out there (complete with her having a dead mother and a useless little brother to protect), there are elements that blatantly rip off 'Avatar: The Last Airbender'. Honestly, I can't describe it any other way - "ripoff" is fitting. The magic (faerie? witch? what's the difference? or is it the same?) is mainly made up of the elements water, fire, air and earth - there are evil witches who have an affinity for each - and only the main heroine, Saoirse, can master all of the magic, and defeat them herself. She literally glows (notably her eyes, every time she performs magic) when she becomes too powerful or overemotional, and she floats in the air. Her finding her balance involves meditating and going into a garden, spiritually. There is a character, Hugh the faerie boy, who looks exactly like Sokka with white hair (he ties it back the same as Sokka, too!), and he even acts like him, only he's smugger, and an annoying sonofabitch who exists to "protect" the "poor, helpless" heroine, because the most powerful witch ever apparently can't take care of herself, nor learn anything by herself. Got to have a male potential love interest in these types of stories!

FFS, even the title has the word 'Last' in it. I've seen reviews that do compare 'The Last Witch' to 'Avatar', and I think the creators of the comic intended it that way, when they should have tried harder to make 'The Last Witch' stand out, as its own unique creation.

Before I go any further, I'll get the positives out of the way:

The art is brilliant. It's vibrant, bold, expressive, and I can really see top tier animation studios hiring the artist and colourist to come work for them. One original idea I can give credit to the comic is the use of Irish folklore and mythology as the basis of its worldbuilding; there aren't many modern fantasy stories about them. And as much as I think that the characters are generic templates found in any fantasy quest fiction, there is one that stands out to me: Saoirse's grandmother. It's nice to show that yes, older people can have adventures too, can be a part of a heroic team, and not exist solely to be the know-it-all mentor who typically dies at some point in the story to further the protagonist's development. Nan doesn't die in this book. In fact, Nan might be the only character I consistently liked. As flawed and even stupid as she is (I blame the idiot ball handling done for plot convenience, same goes for her plot convenient secrecy), she is at least aware of it, and tries to redeem herself. Her cigar chomping and smoking (yet the smoke is hardly ever drawn in, for some reason) is charming, too.

Now that that's brought to pass, back to the problems I had with 'The Last Witch':

Urgh, that title. It makes no sense. There are loads of witches and magic users in the graphic novel; the super special female protagonist, Saoirse, is not "the last witch" in any sense. Existing evil witches are common knowledge in this world. Wait, or are they myth, according to what info is given at the beginning? It's very inconsistent and haphazardly thought out, like most things in 'The Last Witch'.

Saoirse's grandmother is a witch!

Speaking of, slight spoiler here, but whatever: The four evil witches that Saoirse has to kill - yes, kill - in order to save the world from the unleashing of the darkness of a faerie king...they are her grandmother's sisters. Nan is the weakest of the sisters, she is barely a witch, and apparently there are only a few witches around who are considered "good". What makes someone who uses magic "good"? Is it just about corruption?

Anyway, to get back on track, the plot is about Saoirse killing her great-aunts - her own family, right after a great tragedy that made her little brother and grandmother her only close relatives left. Her father and her entire village die. This is never addressed. Ever.

I forgot to mention that Saoirse just turned twelve-years-old at the start of the story. She's a child, an orphan wracked with grief, and she is made to kill more members of her family, because it's her destiny. Apparently. Again, this is never addressed.

She does give the witches she encounters a chance to back down and surrender before she battles them, but this seems like a last minute editorial decision, quick and arbitrary, probably done in order to allay her murdering them, her fellow witches and great-aunts. And this is a children's comic.

(Her father's death is barely mentioned again, either, after it is announced. Great writing there.)

On that note, let's talk about Padraig. Remember him? The comic doesn't seem to, once the adventure starts rolling. Even though he's introduced at the very beginning as Saoirse's friend. And potential love interest, like Hugh (yeah, $%!!^**&^!!! off to $**%$!&^%&!!! with that). Also like Hugh (%$!!**^!, I swear they even have the exact same character model), Padraig is an annoying, smug little shit who insults Saoirse, calls her poor, and calls her grandmother a loony. He borderline abuses her, not merely teases her. You have to wonder why they are friends, and why the stubborn and headstrong Saoirse puts up with him.

Another spoiler here: Padraig disappears from the story as quickly as he appeared in it. It is revealed a little later that he died, and was eaten by the local legendary witch. Yeah, she's real, and the myth of her being evil is true, and she's a cannibal, because of course. Or, Padraig was about to be eaten by her; the artwork and dialogue are not clear.

So not only does Saoirse lose her father and her village to a witch, but she loses her childhood best friend to one at the same time. She saw him being cannibalistically eaten before her eyes.

Guess what? Once her quest with her brother and grandmother begins, Padraig is never mentioned again. He might as well never have existed. What masterful storytelling and character writing.

There is a moment near the end where Hugh casts a spell on the group's wagon - or at least, that's what the reader is told he did at the end-end, that he cast a protection spell on the wagon, before setting off to find Saoirse. But the art and dialogue at the occurrence itself strongly indicated that Hugh stole magic from Nan while she was asleep - draining her, absorbing her magic for his own - before going after Saoirse, marking him as a turncoat. There was nothing to suggest that he cast a protection spell over the wagon. Nan, afterwards, is angry at the faerie boy for what he did to the wagon, not for what he obviously did to her. So he's not a villain, then? Then what was Nan saying "It's not yours...it's not..." in her sleep while Hugh's light show is happening around her all about?

Was there no editor for this graphic novel? How do you get away with this kind of sloppiness, and with such fantastic artwork?

Why do the evil witches, who according to the story must die, have darker skin than the light-skinned heroes? Nan is white, but her corrupted sisters are not. Yikes. How the hell did that fly under everyone's radar, too?

And wow, do these powerful witches (and faeries? Apart from Hugh they barely factor into the book) really have to die at the hands of a twelve-year-old? At the hands of a young girl who a day ago didn't know she was a witch, and who wasn't even sure witches existed up until now?

Additionally, the witches killed both Saoirse's parents on two separate occasions. How convenient.

Finally, there's Saoirse's witchmark. It's what initially marks her as super special. She's had it her whole life, and it has made her an outcast in her village. A freak. Although this is yet another underdeveloped thread that goes nowhere, as well as an example of telling instead of showing. Her secret witch grandmother never explained to her what the mark was and why it was there before, because of reasons. Said mark is an intricate symbol (I think it's supposed to be Celtic?) on her shoulder, that she can just easily cover up with her clothes anytime, if she has to hide it. It's not ugly, like Padraig the dick and sham of a friend says. It's cool. It's pretty. It's the source of her magic powers.

FFS, writers and artists, if you want your heroine to be an outcast because of something to do with her appearance, have the guts to make her ugly! Give her big marks or scars on her face, things she can't hide as easily. Give her a deformity. Or a disability, for some much needed diversity in the fantasy genre. Saoirse is an able-bodied redhead who has boys keep saying how pretty she is! (I remind you, she's twelve!)

Have people who are not white not be the villains or suspicious! This is ridiculous and unforgivable for a 2021 publication.

Okay, one more example of how unoriginal 'The Last Witch' is: It uses a little girl's cloth doll, found by the heroine in a perishing town, as a signifier that people have died, including, likely, the doll's owner; just like in Disney's animated 'Mulan' movie.

Well, I'm done.

I'm sorry, I wanted to like 'The Last Witch', truly, for it seemed like my kind of thing. But I can't overlook bad storytelling, bad, inconsistent editing, overused clichés, tropes and archetypes, and how it offers nearly nothing new to the table. I have no doubt that the production team behind it tried to make it epic and awesome and worth remembering. Sadly, it didn't work for me.

Final Score: 2/5

P.S. I've hesitated to call Saoirse the overused and sexist term "Mary Sue" throughout this review, even though she legitimately ticks most of not all of the boxes for it. The more I think about it, with the evidence presented, the more likely it looks that she is a Mary Sue.

P.P.S. Hang on a second, what about Saoirse's father having the same name as Hugh's faerie warrior grandfather, in a tale told by Hugh? Is that ever going to come back, into play, or in any way? Argh! Stick with your ideas or don't include them at all, comic!

Graphic Novel Review - 'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' by Rey Terciero (Writer), Megan Kearney (Artist)

A fun, cute and cartoony retelling of the fairy tale and ballet, 'Swan Lake', that also makes references to Tchaikovsky's other works. It's such a romp.

Set in a world actually called Tchaikovsky's Realm, 'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' contains adventure, a magical quest inspired by a childhood storybook, sword fighting girls, two divided kingdoms on the brink of war, deceptional reputations of kingdoms and peoples as well as other royal shenanigans, animals - including a swan (of course) and other birds, and a bear, and goblins (whose language might seem alien at first, but is actually just bad abbreviated text! Ha!). Oh, and dancing. And no doubt beautiful music to go with it, but since this is a comic book you may have to imagine it's the original ballet score playing.

There's a lake serpent in there, too.

'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' is very similar to another all-ages cartoony princess graphic novel, 'Princess Princess Ever After' by Kay O'Neill; right down to both starring an adventuring young trio consisting of two princesses and a prince. Dillie Rotbart, the sword fighting tomboy, even looks like a light-skinned Amira (and their hair is identical), and Odette Bloom is just like Sadie but with pink hair. Siegfried "Fred" Montrose is the third wheel cowardly prince, who is not really cowardly but a funny and sweet subversion of toxic masculinity (blatantly, amusingly said in dialogue, in this case); a lot like Princes Vladric from 'Princess Princess Ever After', only Fred is a POC, and an adorable cinnamon bun who has a vastly stronger and more dynamic presence in his longer story (and he has a friend who's a bear, Benno). It does seem as though Rey Terciero and Megan Kearney took great inspiration from that comic, not necessarily ripping it off. 'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' is its own fun and funny identity, anyway.

Princess Odile "Dillie" of Rotbart is not a villain, a dark mirror, nor a rival of the swan princess like in the original tale. She's a bored, restless, fiery, impulsive young girl who yearns for adventure. She doesn't want to take responsibility and her mother's place on the throne some day (her kingdom is a matriarchy) (side note: her father is a queer and quirky scientist, mistakenly thought by the Bloom Kingdom to be an evil sorcerer; how's that for a subversion?). Dillie is adept with the sword (equalling her four older brothers), and is offhandedly a bookworm. Girl's got layers!

On her quest to break Odette's swan curse and prove her reputedly dour and wicked kingdom's innocence, she learns that heroism means as much about patience, understanding, and using your words, as much as it means charging forwards into danger and using violence, if not more so. Dillie is stronger, kinder, braver, wiser, and more spirited and capable than she knows, as she'll find out. She also has a prosthetic leg, and she named her sword Cassandra.

From a few details gathered above, am I the only one seeing elements of Pixar's 'Brave' to Dillie's character?

Last note regarding Dillie: as well as Princess Amira, Dillie reminds me of Marceline from 'Adventure Time' in both looks and personality...and in her relationship status with a pink princess.

Princess Odette of Bloom is a sweet girl who, since she was a newborn, has unfortunately been under a spell put on her by a mysterious wizard, so that every day she turns into a swan, and every night back into a girl. Her parents are overprotective of her, but she desperately wishes for freedom from her royal cage - to go out dancing, for she dreams of being a ballerina (she seems to be a better dancer as a swan at the moment, due to lack of training).

She and Dillie meet by chance one night, and despite the sheltered kids' rocky start (neither of them have really had any friends before), and the tensions between their rivalling kingdoms, they become friends (how very 'Romeo and Juliet'. Hmm). Then they set out on a quest together to break Odette's curse and save both their kingdoms from declaring war.

But is it really a curse? Is Odette being a swan half the time something to be ashamed of? What if she's not broken and fragile, and doesn't need to change? What if she could use a sword like Dillie? What if she could still be a dancer? What if she could still do anything?

Prince Fred and Benno the bear tag along, providing further comic relief.

The themes of war solving nothing; that not everything is as they appear; that reputations and propaganda are not always true; and that it is a progressive, safe and beautiful thing to get to know each other instead of dividing and isolating ourselves from other places - that's how dangerous rumours and falsehoods fester - that peace is possible - these are brilliant lessons that 'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' teaches. Why not dance instead of fight? Why not sing and create stories - create art that frees the soul - instead of lies?

Children are much wiser than adults in solving stupid conflicts, aren't they? "Who knows why people do bad things?", Odette's mother says to her at one point, like she'll be one to talk later. No one should have to start wars. No one should have to die. Proving you are "better" than someone or somewhere else through violence, spawned out of hate, revenge, pettiness and misplaced issues, means nothing. It only proves that you are nothing, and empty and hurting inside.

I have to mention that, yeah, I totally ship Dillie and Odette. There are tiny hints throughout that their friendship may become something more in the future, but maybe not right now. They are both twelve years old, after all. They hug, cuddle, and hold hands a lot - seriously, there is so much handholding between these two, they even do it on the cover! - and there is one image of their fingers lightly touching in front of a heart-shaped cave entrance. I mean, come on!

'Swan Lake' is not explicitly queer like 'Princess Princess Ever After' - it's all in code, like Fred's entire character - but it works well for what it is, so it's not too irritating.

The whole 'Swan Lake' ballet motif that the graphic novel has going for it, with its dancing girl/swan/pretty bird, sword fighting hero, and helpless prince, plus it referencing other fairy tales...there's something else it reminds me of: the anime 'Princess Tutu'. Another deliberate homage? Probably not, probably a coincidence, but I can dream.

'Swan Lake: Quest for the Kingdoms' is far from perfect, as there are a few abrupt plot, character and dialogue inconsistencies, especially at the beginning, that an editor might have helped fix. Speaking of inconsistencies, the very beginning of the book shows how Odette came to be cursed, when she was a baby, when her mother stopped the cloaked wizard halfway through the spell. But it had happened at night time, meaning Odette shouldn't have been a swan yet, so how could her parents have immediately known that there was something wrong - shocking and horrifying, even - with her? Was it a one time thing for the beginner spell? It doesn't make sense, and it should have been another fix from the editor. Was there an editor?

But no worries. It's a fab story with fab art and characters. Woven throughout are important themes and messages. Recommended.

Final Score: 4/5

Friday 15 April 2022

Book Review - 'Wonder Woman (DC Super Heroes: Wonder Woman) (Little Golden Book)' by Laura Hitchcock (Writer), Pernille Ørum (Illustrator)

A very truncated introduction to Wonder Woman. It doesn't even mention that her real name is Diana once. Not to mention that it has her fighting a lot of villainesses (including Harley Quinn, plus the Cheetah and Giganta of Wonder Woman's rogues gallery), but never working alongside any heroines; just the male members of the Justice League. She's the Smurfette, all over again.

And why do modern Wondy stories keep glossing over her Amazonian heritage and sisterhood?! Why does this book say that her mother was the Queen of the Amazons - was, as in past tense?!

But the tiny picture book is light, breezy, colourful and full of positivity (Diana and the other good guys are always smiling! It's so twee and yet I can't hate it - it's fun and adorable and pure). It achieves what it had set out to do. I like the art, especially Diana's long black hair!

It literally ends with Wondy finding a lost dog for a little girl. The whole thing is cute, and it's still Wonder Woman, in her positive superhero aspects, so I've got to give it that much.

All my other 'Wonder Woman' book reviews, where I have a habit of writing about the world's most famous and iconic superheroine in great, massive, fangirly length, can be found here.

Final Score: 3/5

Book Review - 'Black Widow (Little Golden Book) (Marvel)' by Christy Webster (Writer), Ann Marcellino (Illustrator)

A cute and colourful introduction to a character who is anything but. It is a very concise and ephemeral dossier of Black Widow/Natasha Romanoff, listing her role as a superspy (though what we actually get out of her as a "master of disguise" here is when she wears a big cloak on a park bench, apparently as a pigeon lady...how clever and original), as a great mercenary and fighter (but not specifically an assassin, oh no! And let's not bring attention to her shady and horrifically dark past. Red Room? What's that?! Nor mention her time as a morally grey villain, brainwashed or not!), and then as an Avenger (who is such a team player and cares so much for her friends the big buff male Avengers! Always has and always will! Didn't you know that!? Look at her riding the Hulk (but not in that way, this is a picture book for babies, after all!)).

But it's all in good, lighthearted fun, like my joking above. Yelena Belova is in this, as the main villain. Captain Marvel is present as part of the Avengers, too, so at least Black Widow isn't too much of the typical only "tough" girl in the sausage fest roster of male superheroes.

There is entertainment value to be had in the Little Golden Book of Black Widow, despite how short it is.

I'll be keeping it, alongside the Little Golden Books about Marvel's other superheroines, Captain Marvel and Kamala Khan's Ms. Marvel.

Final Score: 3/5

Book Review - 'Kamala Khan: Ms. Marvel (Little Golden Book) (Marvel)' by Nadia Shammas (Writer) Janelle Anderson (Illustrator)

A nice children's introduction to Kamala Khan/Ms. Marvel. It's plotless, and it mostly lists truncated versions of events in Kamala's start as a superhero (as well as later on when she leaves the Avengers to form her own teen superhero team in her home turf), but for what it is, it works. It leaves out basically nothing about her as is established in the Marvel canon, such as her being a Pakistani American teen who loves superheroes, as well as her family, her friends, her Muslim religion, her heritage, and her hometown of Jersey City. Everything about her makes her a good hero, and a good person (telling the reader over and over again how and why she helps people can get repetitive quickly, however).

An added beautiful touch the picture book makes is that it says that Kamala's family fully supports her - they are a lot nicer and more understanding than in the comics and other media! (Bonus points for implying that they know she is Ms. Marvel, too. This is a good thing. Take note, Marvel).

A unique and awesome and inspiring teen superheroine!

Final Score: 3.5/5

P.S. Funny how in this Little Golden Book it says that Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel used to be known as Ms. Marvel, when in her own Little Golden Book this detail isn't mentioned at all.

Book Review - 'Captain Marvel (Little Golden Book) (Marvel)' by John Sazaklis (Writer), Penelope R. Gaylord (Illustrator)

Such a fun little thing! Colourful, cute and refreshing. Great for beginner fans of the Marvel superheroine Captain Marvel, aka Carol Danvers. It's a nice, itty-bitty bitesize treat for all fans.

Although it does entirely omit the Earth's Mightiest Hero's past as Ms. Marvel. But I guess a baby-short introduction and page number are required for these Little Golden Books.

Carol's Flerkin cat is spotlighted, too! I adore it.

Carol, a human with freeing and stupendous alien powers who embraces everything about herself and holds nothing back, is part of a couple of superhero teams - like the Avengers and the Guardians of the Galaxy - who fight villains both intergalactic and on Carol's home earth turf.

She is such a positive, powerful and shining hero, as she should be.

For more book reviews where I talk about the awesomeness that is Carol Danvers, click here.

Final Score: 4.5/5

Tuesday 12 April 2022

Graphic Novel Review - 'Wolfwalkers: The Graphic Novel' by Tomm Moore (Creator), Ross Stewart (Creator), Sam Sattin (Adaptation)

Just as good as the film, in my opinion. In fact it's almost exactly the same as the film. This graphic novel was made for people who don't have access to the still-scarcely-released Cartoon Saloon animated feature 'Wolfwalkers'; and it is for people who have seen it, as well.

Whatever the medium, it is a powerful, enriching, wonderful story, with great characters and themes, and stupendous art.

A quote from my blog about 'Wolfwalkers', the film, which also applies to the graphic novel, in nearly every way:


'It's right up my alley, not just in its rich quality, but in terms of aesthetics, tastes, features and themes. It's a heartfelt treat for the eyes and ears. It's magical.

Speaking of, I always thought that animation is the closest we get to seeing real magic on the screen - it is a medium with literally no limitations - and 
Wolfwalkers and a few of Cartoon Saloon's other films work hard to showcase this. It's also great that 2D animated films are still being made, and are lauded for their efforts in creativity, originality and vibrancy. They're as potentially beautiful - and necessary - as any art style.

I love animation. I love three dimensional and fleshed out female protagonists. I love mythology and tales. I love animals. I love wolves. I love mother-and-daughter relationships. I love father-and-daughter relationships.

Yeah, go 
Wolfwalkers.'


A vitality. Boldly, soulfully, spiritually, movingly and aesthetically pleasing. Highly recommended.

Final Score: 5/5

Manga Review - 'Creepy Cat, Vol. 1' by Cotton Valent

What if 'Garfield' was goth? What if 'Garfield' had a female human artist protagonist*, and the cat himself was a big, white, flooffy, floopy, shape-changing, multiplying demon from the ghostly, grisly depths of whatever nether realm he came from, but he is still inexplicably adorable? And what if 'Garfield' was also a manga?

Then you have 'Creepy Cat' by Cotton Valent. It's supernatural, it's occult, it's spooky, it's weird, it's hilarious, it's macabre, it's ominous, it's cute, it's effed up, it has cats in it - in other words, it was made for me.

Yeah, some of the humour and scares are hit-and-miss - and the Halloween special at the end barely has a concept, and its ending is unsatisfying; how bizarre and disappointing - but overall I enjoyed the squishy guts out of it.

As scary or gory as I make it sound, 'Creepy Cat, Vol. 1' is not too OTT that older children can't read it; it's a bit scary, but very funny.

Perhaps most hilarious of all, 'Creepy Cat' knows a lot about cats, and its portrayal of them is realistic. I mean, speaking as someone who grew up with cats and who now owns two kitties (some of the relatable stuff in the comic made me guffaw and shout "YES! THIS! OMG!"), I'm inclined to believe that all cats are wickedly, playfully, contentedly evil to some extent (as well as lazy).

After all, no one really owns a cat. Cats own you.

They own your home. As far as they're concerned, it's more their home than yours.

They take over.

They take over your life - they make sure of it.

They possess you























one way or another.

Final Score: 3.5/5

*Flora, who is like Wednesday Addams cross-stitched with Sally from 'The Nightmare Before Christmas', Lydia Deetz, and an Isekai shoujo heroine.