Sunday 30 July 2023

Graphic Novel Review - 'Dear Rosie' by Meghan Boehman, Rachael Briner (Contributor)

A cute and sad coming-of-age children's graphic novel about friendship, family, loss and grief.

With the characters all being animals, who live, act and dress exactly like modern day humans, 'Dear Rosie' gave me 'Arthur', 'Rupert' and 'The Wind in the Willows' vibes, except the main characters are girls. Four modern middle school girls - Millie (our protag, a deer), Florence (a fox), Gabby (a badger), and Claire (a mouse) - who are dealing with the aftermath of the death of one of their friend group, Rosie (a cat). They try to remain friends forever, and honour and cherish Rosie's memory. But life, being what it is, keeps getting in the way. In the span of a year, they are in danger of being driven apart, separated, via different and painfully realistic means.

On top of everything, Millie finds a notebook left mysteriously at her family's laundromat, which might be linked to Rosie. To escape her grief, she immerses herself in the mystery of the notebook and its markings and maps, determined to solve it. To maybe "find" Rosie again, and at last make life make sense again. Millie involves the other girls in solving the mystery, though each are going through their own problems, exacerbated by the sudden, tragic, heartbreaking loss of Rosie.

Can they be truly happy again? And with each other, as friends who stick together, forever?

'Dear Rosie' is kind of a contemporary retelling of 'The Wind in the Willows', with young girl leads. Grief and the strength of friendship are major themes in the slice-of-life, coming-of-age story. Anxiety is also captured and expressed really well. It is loosely based on the authors' own personal experiences, and you can tell.

Negative criticism segment:


• The adult characters don't receive much characterisation, nor character arcs (except for Mr. DeAlba the old eccentric tortoise, perhaps). They barely appear at all.

• The answer to the mystery ends up being somewhat underwhelming; compounded by the underdeveloped adults problem.

• Where are Rosie's family? They are never mentioned, much less appear in the comic.

• I could get behind the idea of telling a story and drawing everyone in it as cute, bipedal, anthropomorphised animals (including some wildlife local to Boehman's hometown of Frederick, Maryland) - when if they were humans literally nothing would change about the whole thing - just fine. Except that "scaredy-cat" is still a term that's used, as a teasing, carefree, childish insult...when cats are people here. Including Rosie, the dead friend! And Florence's dad is a bear. Animals such as cows are just cows, not people. Details such as these are always going to be...weird in an animals-as-humans concept - like, who count as intelligent, sentient, talking beings and civilians and who don't? - especially for a child audience. And what about the meat in this world? "Veggie dogs"!? Is everyone a cannibal?!

• Connected to the point above is a small panel on page 128 where Claire encounters a...real, titchy, nontalking mouse. I'm sure it is supposed to be a funny, nudge-wink moment directed at the readers.


I guess if I think of the characters as humans who merely look like animals to the audience, the animals-as-humans-with-no-thought-to-the-worldbuilding-surrounding-that-whatsoever conceit becomes less of an issue. Or I should stop overthinking it and enjoy the children's comic.

Sad, sweet, soft, winsome and heartwarming, 'Dear Rosie' is a unique and charming little middle grade graphic novel, when those are not usually my cup of tea. It's not among the absolute best graphic novels I've ever read, but it's a keeper. A small, oddly-shaped but rare and novel trinket hidden at the bottom of a treasure chest, giving off its own crooked, yet warm and tantalising bronze light. Its adorable cover, with its twinkle, definitely caught my eye right away when I spotted it in my local bookshop, not having heard of it beforehand.

'Dear Rosie' is a lovely autumn read as well.

Final Score: 3.5/5

Non-Fiction Book Review - 'Stacey's Remarkable Books' by Stacey Abrams (Writer), Kitt Thomas (Illustrator)

An adorable, vibrant and powerful kids' picture book, based on Stacey Abrams's own (reimagined) childhood surrounding school and making lifelong friends. And reading. Lots and lots of reading.

Thursday, when classes take a trip to the school library, is Adventure Day!

Diversity and learning about other people's backgrounds, languages and cultures - found in the power of words in books, and from the people themselves, in their own voices - are key to making 'Stacey's Remarkable Books' stand out in importance, from many other "books about books" titles out there.

The books, the languages, the exciting subjects, the library, the friendships formed, the bonding over a growing reading club, the adorable diverse kids, the supportive adults, the picture book reading list at the end, the colours and the art - it's all so good!

No doubt about it, 'Stacey's Remarkable Books' is passionate, driven and dedicated.

Highly recommended, for helping people to become better, well, people.

Final Score: 4/5

Book Review - 'A Spoonful of Frogs' by Casey Lyall (Writer), Vera Brosgol (Illustrator)

A very funny picture book about a witch, her cooking show, 'Bewitching Kitchen', and frogs. Those slippery frogs.

Martha Stewart meets Rachael Ray meets Elvira meets Winnie the Witch meets Elphaba - what winning, witchy ingredients!

A hilarious Halloween treat (no trick). Colourful and charming, a classic in the making.

Final Score: 4/5

Friday 28 July 2023

Book Review - 'That Flag' by Tameka Fryer Brown (Writer), Nikkolas Smith (Illustrator)

A very important book for our times.

'That Flag' - think 'The Hate U Give' as a picture book for younger readers, though everyone should read it. A vital, pointed message and history lesson about that hate flag. That violence, oppression, and division flag. That flag of white supremacists, nationalists and insurrectionists.

That, and a coming-of-age story about the friendship between two young girls, Keira and Bianca, in America. It's also about Keira and her family, living in America.

It's a personal story. And a universal one.

After reading the sad, harrowing yet hopeful book, read the notes at the end, as well. Read all that is written here - the history, the facts, the Authors Note, and the Illustrator's Note.

Excerpt:


'[...] the Confederate flag cannot magically be separated from its racist origins nor from its continued association with white supremacy. It is only by acknowledging the entire truth of our history--including the unflattering parts-- that we will finally be able to overcome the racism embedded in our society. We must never be afraid to ask questions and seek out truth, for it is the truth that will set us all free.'


Excerpts from the Author's Note:


'I want to help readers understand why it is not merely a symbol of "Southern heritage", but an emblem that makes many people feel anger and fear--and for good reason. I believe in telling kids the truth, even about things that are sad or a little bit scary.'

'If human beings can learn to be racist, we can also learn not to be. In fact, your generation could grow up to be the fairest, most inclusive generation out nation has ever seen...especially if we adults do our part and tell you more truths about more things.

I wrote
 That Flag to do my part to make humanity better, because I believe in your power to change the world.'


Excerpt from the Illustrator's Note:


'To all of you youngsters out there who stand up and speak out for human rights and justice for all, thank you for leading the way to a brighter future. Never let anyone silence your voice.'


Final Score: 5/5

Book Review -'A Big Mooncake for Little Star' by Grace Lin

The best retelling of 'Goodnight Moon' ever.

'A Big Mooncake for Little Star' - such a simple bedtime story, but so tasty! And it's about the moon phases, cooking and eating sweet things, Asian and Chinese culture, and mother-and-daughter bonds. If I ever have a daughter, or if I am ever tasked with reading to very young children, but especially little toddler girls, then this will definitely be my first choice of reading at bedtime.

The mother and daughter in this case being technically (metaphorically?) goddesses - of the moon and stars and the rest of space - is another huge bonus.

'A Big Mooncake for Little Star' has a sort of nostalgic, timeless, airy, nighttime feel to it. I can imagine it would have stuck in my mind (like twinkling crumbs on my licked fingers) forever, if I had read it at an age when I was just learning to read.

There is also a sort of, maybe message in it about encouraging and condoning naughtiness, but it's cute, memorable, delightful and delicious, so who cares? On its own it won't magically make children want to be naughty. There's enough magic contained within its story.

I had already loved Grace Lin's other works, most notably the children's fairy tale novel 'Where the Mountain Meets the Moon', and now, upon reading this picture book by her, I can confidently confirm that it is another glorious, sparkling win in her bibliography.

'A Big Mooncake for Little Star' - a short, sweet, simple, sleepy, starry, stunning, scrumptious thing.

Mooncakes!

Final Score: 4/5

Book Review - 'The Bookshop Cat' by Cindy Wume

Wow this is adorable.

A little cat who loves reading just happens to find and get a job at a bookshop. Just like that.

This black cat is ridiculously lucky! He's living the dream without even trying!

Everything about 'The Bookshop Cat' is cute. The artwork, the cats, the other animals, the children, the books, the bookshop itself (specifically a children's bookshop, so apparently only for children (???)) - the whole book about cats and reading books screams and radiates cute. It's wholesome, soft, snuggly, comfy, cuddly and cosy. It's a precious, doughy, squashy, toddling, fluffy baby of a picture book.

There's a supportive family message to appreciate about it, as well.

The Bookshop Cat's passion is so infectious and inspiring.

So, final verdict: Simple, colourful, and CUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTE. Highly recommended for all ages.


'[...] with a book, you can go anywhere and be anything!'


'The Bookshop Cat loves his job, and if you happen to pass by, then stop and listen.

You're sure to hear a loud, contented purr coming from inside.
'


Final Score: 3.5/5

Book Review - 'Three Little Vikings' by Bethan Woollvin

2023 EDIT: Part of my 2023 clear-up, of books I no longer like, or am no longer interested in, or remember well as standing out, or find as special anymore, or I otherwise will not miss.

Final Score: 3.5/5





Original Review:



Warning: Do not make a drinking game out of the number of times the word Viking is used in this review.



I wasn't fond of the artwork at first, but 'Three Little Vikings' is a fun, cute little picture book. It's about three little Viking girls, Ebba, Helga and Wren (their initials are helpfully stitched into their clothing or bags for the reader to tell which one is which), who save their Viking village, using their wits, common sense, reading, and practical skills. Because young girls are learned and are more willing and able to help people than old, pompous, arrogant, loud, blustering men in unearned positions of power who always claim to know best while offering no proof whatsoever - no reason - to back up that claim. Who do nothing that really helps anyone, and often make stuff up - create imaginary problems, threats and scapegoats - to avoid having to do anything about the REAL issues.

I love that Helga has a horse-shaped pegleg, and Wren wears glasses, too. Disability rep FTW! And in a fantasy/historical fiction children's book. About three little girl Vikings. Who are also murderers.

They are Vikings, after all.

Ahem.

Wait, the girls are best friends, not sisters, but apparently they live together? They and the stupid chieftain are the only human characters we see. The story could have done with an overt anti-gold, anticapitalism message, as well. Anti-greed all around.

Final Score: 3.5/5

Wednesday 26 July 2023

Book Review - 'The Fairy Garden' by Georgia Buckthorn (Writer), Isabella Mazzanti (Illustrator)

One of the most beautifully illustrated, and wholesome and charming, pictures books I've ever read. It's got fairies, and fairy gardens, and fairy conservation tips, what more could you want?

I won't spoil (soil? dig up? unearth? prematurely hold up to the light?) anything. I'll just keep my review short, simple and sweet, like 'The Fairy Garden' itself, but nowhere near as good.

Breathtaking, ethereal, whimsical, clever and imaginative, I adore 'The Fairy Garden'. It's my dainty, fairy cup of lilac blossom tea.

Final Score: 4/5

Book Review - 'The Girl Who Loves Bugs' by Lily Murray (Writer), Jenny Løvlie (Illustrator)

A lovely, funny, colourful and cartoony picture book about a little girl who loves bugs. A girl after my own heart indeed!

The only insects I've ever been afraid of are bees and wasps (flies just annoy me, the useless, pointless, disease-carrying pests). I love spiders, moths, maggots, worms, glow-worms, millipedes, centipedes, stick insects, and caterpillars, as well as the "prettier" butterflies, ladybirds, and fireflies. Creepy crawlies, snug-as-bugs-in-a-rug - you name it, I won't shy away from or hesitate near them, when I would everything else. I have always been weird, and proud of it! I love exploring different aspects of life, and living creatures. Amazing.

'The Girl Who Loves Bugs' by Lily Murray and Jenny Løvlie - adorable and inspiring. And chockfull of bugs! AND the girl has two mums! Recommended!

Final Score: 4/5

Wednesday 5 July 2023

Graphic Novel Review - 'Basil and Oregano' by Melissa Capriglione

Spoilers ahead.


Artemis Crescent's graphic novel review of something she should have loved - that features practically everything she loves. But unfortunately, ultimately doesn't. Because bad writing - messy, poorly planned, problematic writing on a massive, moon-sized scale - shouldn't be brushed aside in favour of aesthetics and good ideas. For execution is everything.

Yep, right after my review of 'Fae and the Moon' (which can be read here) comes a review of a similar graphic novel from 2023 - ridiculously, unbearably cute magical girl power set in a fantastical world, that I desperately wanted to adore and keep. But my sound, logical brain won out over my heart. I know I've been repeating myself lately, but I will reiterate: 'Fae and the Moon' and 'Basil and Oregano' are middling, messy, random, confusing and baffling stories, and excellent artwork and ideas don't change that.

'Basil and Oregano' is a step-up in that it is an LBGTQ+ story - lovingly so, in fact. No one is straight, and practically half the cast are not cisgender. Queer, trans and nonbinary people are the norm in this world that is a reflection of our contemporary age but with witches and magic. It is like 'Harry Potter' meets 'The Great British Bake Off', and it is set in a wonderful dream world where queerphobia doesn't exist. The graphic novel should have been revolutionary; it should have been praised to the heavens, and beloved by everyone on Planet Earth. But... well.

Here is a list of things wrong with 'Basil and Oregano':


• At the very beginning, the teen witch protagonist Basil Eyres is given an apron that belonged to one of her dads, before her senior year at magiculinary boarding school begins. The apron is special and important to them. You'd think it would come up again. But it doesn't. Basil only wears it in one exam scene, and that's it. In fact, the magical cooking students are hardly ever seen wearing aprons, just their uniforms. So what's the point of the aprons if they're not going to be worn for anything important - or for anything at all, really?

• On the subject of pointless things being brought up - this time out of the effing blue - and nothing is done with them and then they are straight-up forgotten about, there's Basil's plant, named Poe. It suddenly appears in her dorm room eighty two pages into the book, but Basil treats it like it's her favourite and most constant companion and pet. It appears in two scenes, and then it is gone, never to be mentioned again. In the middle of the book, Basil experiences a magic burnout, which manifests in the form of greenery forming around her and on her as she falls into a coma. I had thought that the plant in her room had something to do with this at first, but no. There is no indication that Poe is anything but an ordinary potted plant, which gets knocked over amidst Basil's burnout, and then we never see it again. WHAT. IS. THE. POINT. OF. THE. PLANT? WHY INCLUDE THE PLANT? DID THIS COMIC NOT GO THROUGH ANY EDITING STAGES? ANY PLANNING STAGES?

• As other reviewers have pointed out, how scholarships and tuition work in the Porta Bella Magiculinary Academy is effed up to all hell. To achieve in this school-- no, to even attend this school, you either have to be richer than gods, or be the top student at everything, in most of your classes, in most of your exams (which are numerous and constant), or else you lose your scholarship and will be kicked out of the system. It is not really a school: it is a competition, a winner-takes-all capitalist nightmare, culminating in an actual public baking contest that is the school year's final exam/round. Apparently, one person a year wins above all others and gets to win at life, while the other students who have worked just as painfully and dangerously hard (unless they're, again, richer than Midas) lose their chances for good, and can go eff themselves. It is not until the very end that this is called out on for the unfair system it is that only benefits shareholders, and it is changed (by rich people in positions of power, because of course), because it needs to, for how the hell will this society function otherwise? With its thousands of broke, disadvantaged, burned-out and jobless people, their dreams and passions destroyed and talents and hard work gone to waste? Every one of the teachers at the academy, as well as the Arch Chef and the rest of the administration, should be ashamed of themselves for putting so much pressure on teenagers. They expect them to be perfect at everything, all the time, and even that won't be enough for this single-winner-takes-all batter-royale school of misery and exploitation. These poor students are killing themselves with the stress, if not literally than through burnout and injuring themselves. And stress does kill, especially the young. In 'Basil and Oregano', in an LBGTQ+-friendly world, capitalism still runs rampant and uncontrolled. Like in the real world, too, it is also ableist AF.

• How exactly does the magic in this world work? Does it only apply to magiculinary, the art of cooking and baking? But it is also used for cleaning clothes in a flash (dishwashing spells, they're called), and for hypnotizing dragons seemingly at random and making them attack a specific mark. Magiculinary is a huge deal, but it is unclear if it the only deal for every magic user in the world. If the reason why this specific type of magic is focused on so heavily and universally is because it is the singular, be-all-and-end-all of magic... for some reason. It is all anyone talks about, at any rate.

• How is magical cooking any different from cooking without magic? Is it only that ordinary cooking without magical utensils (which resemble wands from various cute Magical Girl anime) is slower? Is it that the taste of the food will be better with magic? Or when the food is prepared using magic? Perhaps I am overthinking it, but I am confused.

• In the climax, in the final magical chef exam/festival/public competition for the teen girls' lives that is out in the open, a dragon is summoned out of a mountain by resident mean girl Xynthia, to wreck and sabotage Basil's and Arabella Oregano (her love interest)'s cooking. It is literally the first ever mention, let alone sight, of dragons existing in this world. Familiars, cute magical creatures, and familiars that turn "dark", sure, but no dragons. No huge and potentially dangerous beasts like that.

• To add insult to something that was already pulled out of the writer's backside at the last minute, after the rampaging dragon is tamed by Basil and Arabella using bonding over food, Arch Chef Spink recognises it as an ancient familiar from over a hundred years ago (they'd dated the dragon's owner's grandson in college), and they call it "Arrabbiata", like that means something, other than the name of a pasta sauce. The other characters act like they know the name and the legend, but it is the first time the reader hears of them! No hints, no foreshadowing, nothing. What should have been plot developments are, well, not. They are not developed in the slightest, and come right out of nowhere. It is unbelievably sloppy, and so poorly executed I have to wonder how the book got published as it is.

• Basil starts her and Arabella's bond-over-food plan on the dragon by... insulting it and then whacking it in the face with her utensil. It is when she injures and brings it down that she executes the pacifying-it-gently-and-patiently-with-food spell breaking strategy. Counterintuitive, contradictory and self-defeating don't begin to describe it. It looks like abuse to me. Making it worse is the dragon is under a spell and not acting of its own free will. As aggressive as Basil is portrayed as being sometimes, including towards people she supposedly loves, often inconsistently, though it's mainly due to stress and pressure, this is by far the worst thing she does in the comic - and it is framed as the right thing to do!

• Why is Xynthia being deliberately and obviously evil in her sabotaging plans for Basil and Arabella? She sends her familiar to stalk and spy on them, and to steal their stuff, and then she actually posts about it on her Prestogram (heh) account, bragging about how evil she is and that she's 'Totally not up to anything shady at all.' (Yes. She writes this. It is a direct quote. I am not making it up). And Basil and Arabella do absolutely nothing about it. They let her get away with it, and don't try to stop her plan. WHY?! GO TELL A TEACHER IF YOU CAN'T STOP HER YOURSELF - THERE IS EVIDENCE! XYNTHIA HAS WILLFULLY INCRIMINATED HERSELF! THE DRAGON INCIDENT WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED IF OUR "HEROES" HAD DONE LITERALLY ANYTHING TO PREVENT IT BEFOREHAND!

• Why is Xynthia easily forgiven at the end? Why is Arabella's controlling mother, who is ashamed of her nonmagical daughter, easily forgiven, and redeemed at the drop of a hat? And so are Arch Chef Spink, the administration and the teachers? People don't change that quickly, and don't deserve to be forgiven that quickly after a lifetime of abuse.

• Xynthia's arm is in a cast after the dragon attack she caused. It is the only thing of consequence for her actions. She receives no punishment whatsoever, for the mass destruction and nearly getting people killed. With her light, little cast, she quite literally gets a slap on the wrist after everything she's done. One "sorry" and heavy family troubles - plus desperation and stress due to the school's impractical and inhumane competitive tuition policy - don't erase a terrorist attack brought on by mean girl pettiness!

• Why is the title of the graphic novel 'Basil and Oregano', and not 'Basil and Arabella'? Oregano is Arabella's surname, but she is never referred to as just Oregano, and certainly not by her partner in love, Basil Eyres. Is it because of the fame and prestigiousness of Arabella's family name? That's classist, and goes against the story's message of individualism and loving yourself for who you are, doesn't it? For consistency and fairness, the book should be called 'Eyres and Oregano'.

• Do two witches have to always share the familiar they've summoned for help for school festivals? Or is that only as a starting point, for sharing and learning, and a witch can bond with their own familiar later? But where would they get one? Will they have to inherit one from their family? But which is it - summon a familiar by magic, or inheritance? Does it depend on different circumstances? What if there are no inheritance familiars left, having died of old age? Is it okay for a witch to have no familiar? To have no "help" in their magiculinary? Another poorly thought out worldbuilding point, leaving behind so many questions.

• Basil's two best friends, Villy, who is nonbinary, and Addy, who is Black and trans, should have received more page time and development. And a resolution to their story arcs and partnership.

• During the dragon attack, Arch Chef Spink calls out to the teachers, "Let's get the townspeople and the kings out of here!" Wait, WHAT? WHAT!? WHAT KINGS!? There's been no mention, no indication, of any type of monarchy, nor royalty, existing in this society until that line. And who are the kings? Are they any of the male rich people in the background in a few panels? What makes them any different from the other rich, snobbish people we see? Why was the line included at all when it is dropped from nowhere, for no reason, and makes zero sense? ARGH! SO MANY ARSE PULLS IN THIS SINGLE SCENE! AND IT'S THE CLIMAX!


Easily fixable flaws, that weren't fixed. I am flummoxed, and disappointed. What a waste of potential.

However, like with 'Fae and the Moon', and other cute fantasy girl power graphic novels like it, there are good points. The diversity is fantastic. The artwork and colours are wonderfully done, and freaking adorable. It is like Paulina Ganucheau's body of work. The whole aesthetic of 'Basil and Oregano' screams cute and magical. Basil and Arabella's familiar, the puppy/tomato hybrid named, well, Tomato, is a cute mascot character, who isn't sidelined, forgotten about, or rendered useless to the story. Basil and Arabella's relationship is pretty much the most well developed thing in the comic. It is sweet, lovely, angsty, complex, and they work nicely together. They have chemistry, they have substance, and they spend a lot of time together; enough needed for their romantic relationship to develop naturally.

I wanted to love 'Basil and Oregano' and 'Fae and the Moon'. Badly. Incredibly. But I can't.

I'm truly sorry, really, to the writers and artists hard at work and lucky enough to have their work published. I don't mean to crush your dreams. I do appreciate and understand your efforts, and your art and passion. But I am a critic, and a critic's got to critique, and point out flaws. I believe the people who have worked on these graphic novels will, by jove, by hope, improve and get better overtime. They certainly show promise and aptitude.

I am Fantasy Feminist critic Artemis Crescent, signing out.

Final Score: 2.5/5

Graphic Novel Review - 'Fae and the Moon' by Franco Aureliani (Writer), Catherine Satrun (Artist), Sarah Satrun (Artist)

Spoilers ahead.


Artemis Crescent's graphic novel review of something she should have loved - that features practically everything she loves. But unfortunately, ultimately doesn't. Because bad writing - messy, poorly planned, problematic writing on a massive, moon-sized scale - shouldn't be brushed aside in favour of aesthetics and good ideas. For execution is everything.

My feelings on 'Fae and the Moon' are similar to other graphic novels I've read recently that seemed up my alley, such as 'Cheshire Crossing' and 'Garlic and the Vampire', but had left me disappointed in the end. Mainly due to the aforementioned messiness, confusion, and lacklustre execution (though 'Garlic and the Vampire' is admittedly objectively far superior to the rest, I still expected more out of it).

My 'Fae and the Moon' review won't be the first of its kind I write today. Next one is coming up.

Here is a list of things wrong with 'Fae and the Moon':


• The setting is very limited - to Fae's house, and underneath her house, basically. We only see two panels featuring other people, who are Fae's neighbours, who she never interacts with, and we never see them again.

• There is really no point to Fae's mother's scrapbook and handmade book of potions and spells, other than setting up a blue flower as being a plot point for later on.

• Speaking of Fae's mother, who is she exactly? What is she? Is she a goddess? A witch? Is she immortal? In this world, she actually created the moon, presumably to keep any "dark creatures", who had existed since the beginning of time, at bay. It's not clear how long ago the creation of the moon happened. Was this from even before Fae was born? I have no freaking clue.

• Who are the mice, Frik and Frak, in relation to Fae's mother? In the end she acts like she knows them, and implied she'd sent them to look after Fae while she was gone. Huh?! And did Fae name them? They're nontalking animals, so she must have. But if not, then... what?!

• Why did Frik and Frak steal random stuff from Fae's house and keep them underground? This isn't brought up again.

• How come some animals can talk, while others, like the mice, can't?

• Speaking of, there is no real point to the talking Rat King and his rat horde, either. They could have been cut out of the comic and no difference would have been made. They could have been replaced by any other antagonist role, and no difference would have been made. Their "vermin in hiding taking back and taking over the surface world" plot goes absolutely nowhere. They're expendable, and once the Rat King, who wants the moon's power for himself, is suddenly, swiftly killed off by the dragon (oh, I'll get to him), the rats bugger off, never to be seen or mentioned again. Since they're presented as being an ostracised, marginalised minority race, not wanting to be shamed, killed and forced into hiding anymore, this is more than iffy.

• How did the Rat King know that it was Fae who took the moon from the sky? Never explained!

• The dragon, who we first see destroying Fae's house in trying to find the moon (which Fae had taken down in the hopes that it might bring her missing mother back to her) and Fae's mother (I think?). He is portrayed majorly as a violent brute - remember, he kills the Rat King, squishes him, but the comic doesn't remember, after the fact. Suddenly, at the end, when he is beaten down and dying, he becomes sympathetic - information is dropped on the reader about how Fae's mother had looked after him when he was a hatchling, when "others only wanted to destroy me" (huh? What? Who? Where? Why?!). She apparently just left him as soon as he could look after himself. She didn't bother to see him again afterwards. Sounds like she straight up abandoned him, but the dragon still sees her as his mother. Some mother. This supposedly took place before Fae was born. The dragon loves the mother and wants to protect her - then why did he not try to find her even before the moon went missing?! - and by extension he now wants to protect Fae. Citation needed. He destroyed part of her house with her inside it in his introduction! Even if he didn't know who she was at that point, it's still sloppy writing. Plus, he later says he was trying to stop the monster who was responsible for Fae's mother's disappearance. *Deep breath*, why did he not say so before!? To the scared little girl who looks like her mother in her house!? It could have saved a whole bunch of misunderstandings, such as Fae thinking that it was the dragon who was responsible for her mother's disappearance, because of an extremely vague dream she had (seriously, don't ask, it never makes any sense). He only cared about the moon in his first appearance. His motivation changes more than the moon phases. The dragon, whose name is Kulkan, in the climactic battle, refers to Fae as his "little sister"... and Fae immediately starts referring to him as her brother, despite them barely knowing each other and meeting only under violent, life-and-death circumstances. Also out of nowhere, Kulkan officially becomes part of the family, and Fae's mother's other child... who she'd abandoned for years. What BS.

• How did Kulkan find Fae's mother's house so quickly, years after she left him, if she was moving around constantly whilst in hiding?

• And what was that line from Kulkan calling himself "selfish once", like the Rat King... right as he kills the rodent? It doesn't come up again. Does it link to his past about others trying to kill him as a baby? Allow me to repeat the mantra of this graphic novel: What? Why? Who? When? Where? How? Huh?!

• Fae didn't 100% believe in her mother's stories about the moon and blue flowers and whatnot - they were more like fairy tales to her than anything. She didn't believe that dragons existed until one destroys part of her house. But talking rabbits, talking rats, smart mice, not to mention her being able to take the moon itself right out of the sky using ladders and it then somehow being small enough for her to hide in her cloak, her house, and in the chest in her room, all of this is normal to her. Not worth even commenting on.

• Now onto the talking rabbit himself, Percival. Initially he is set up to be Fae's friend, mentor, and guardian in place of her missing mother. He is like the cute animal mascot common in all magical girl-like media. But then - twist - just over halfway through the comic, he is revealed to be the true villain of the story the whole time. It's a decent and clever twist, though sadly I knew it was coming because someone on Goodreads carelessly revealed it in the first paragraph of their non-spoiler review. Regardless, it doesn't stop the What? Why? Who? When? Where? How? Huh?! mantra of everything. Why is Percival, or whoever he is and whatever he is called, so evil? Why does he want to take over the world? It can't just be because he is a creature of darkness, repelled by the moon. That's racist, isn't it? Why did it take so long for this shapeshifting monster of pure evil, who has existed since time began (however long ago that was in the context of this vague fantasy world and its poor worldbuilding), to find Fae's mother and attempt to deceive her into pulling the moon from the sky? Space is warped and time is bendable in this world and story. Why did he want to find the moon at all once it was gone from the sky, thanks to his tricking Fae into retrieving it herself and hiding it (he didn't count on her doing that specifically, but plot contrivance is plot contrivance)? The moon's gone, he's free in his power at night, and he can rule over everything. He doesn't really need the moon's power. But then he is immune to the moon's power in the sky? Or is less affected than other dark creatures, due to his shapeshifting? Why would the moon being different colours affect its power? In what ways? This point about the colours of the moon also ends up meaning nothing in the grand scheme of things. HOW WAS THIS COMIC PUBLISHED?! Why would Percival bother with the deception of both Fae and her mother at all? He's powerful (not to mention immortal) enough without them and their (witch? goddess?) powers. Whether or not the moon exists is in fact inconsequential to him. IT MAKES NO SENSE!

• It is made clearer at the end that apparently Percival had "killed" Fae's mother by completely absorbing her into him, and it wasn't enough power, so he then came after Fae for her power. Er, why was absorbing the mother, physically and in essence, not enough for him to take the moon? Why does he want the moon again, especially when he has its creator's power inside of him? How did he absorb her anyway? Again, why bother deceiving either of them when he could just absorb them and their power from the get-go?! Percival, in his true monster form, is defeated - killed, I think, though it's not made clear - far too easily by Fae beating him about with the moon he should be immune to. And his flowing blood, together with Fae's tears, make more blue flowers bloom, and free her mother. Thus they are reunited. It really would have been better for the storyline about grief if the mother never came back, if Fae had learned to move on, and grow from there. It feels like a copout.

• Just before Fae beats monster Percival over the head with the moon, she pulls up a weed from the ground (a blue flower stem? I have no frikin' and frakin' clue) and squeezes it, causing her hand to bleed (from its thorns? Its stinging nettles? Once again, I don't know). Why does she do this? It ends up doing absolutely nothing. It affects absolutely nothing. It doesn't even turn the moon in her hands red, indicating a difference in power, like how blue flowers combined with Fae's and her mother's magic can turn it blue. In fact, the weed and the blood disappear from Fae's hand when she first hits Percival with the moon. WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THAT?! HOW DID THIS GET PUBLISHED?

• At the very end, when Fae's mother comes back, Fae mentions that her mother dropped her key in her Moon garden the night she disappeared, and that is why Fae had it around her neck throughout the story. This is literally the first mention of the "found Mother's key in Moon garden" plot point. Fae just has it, and the reader has no idea how she got it up until that moment. The mother is seen wearing it in a couple of panels in flashbacks, but otherwise there is no indication that she ever wore it, as "special" and "important" as it is. This seems like both a writer and an artist problem and miscommunication. I say once more, HOW DID THIS GET PUBLISHED?

• The mother (okay, her name is I'Lette, but I can't be arsed to constantly type that) also drops the bomb at the end: "The power does not run through the veins of every generation, but it seems to be within you [Fae]", and she has family outside of her little house of choice, to hide away from the dark creatures and to protect Fae. Um, WHAT? I thought she was immortal. What generations? What family? I thought she and Fae were the only ones in the world with moon powers, hence why Percival targeted them. How old is she? HOW LONG AGO DID SHE CREATE THE BLOODY MOON?! And why did she feel it necessary to go into hiding from creatures of darkness when she is powerful enough on her own, AND with her moon?


Phew! There are other blatant flaws, but I'm too tired out to write more. It's all so baffling and confusing.

But despite everything above, I don't hate 'Fae and the Moon'. It does contain good points. It is very cute, cartoony and sweet, with great artwork, and I can easily see it being pitched as a pilot on Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, or the Disney Channel. It has decent action scenes. I adore the colours, and the elements and motifs of the moon, magic, animals, gardens, cute tea sets, and mother and daughter bonds.

I only wish the story made sense.

Stay tuned for another review of a middling, messy, baffling fantasy girl power graphic novel I seriously wanted to love.

[EDIT: The review is now up! You can read it here.]

Final Score: 2.5/5