Sunday 28 February 2021

February 2021 Update

Not much happened for me during lockdown this month. When I'm not rereading books, and buying rubbish off of eBay, I'm staying fit and healthy by walking around my area nearly every day. The weather is getting very sunny and warm quickly, making this task easier. I miss being with people, and talking to other humans who are not my immediate family, and I say that as an introvert.

The good news (?) is that I very well might go back to work in mid April, and more restrictions in the UK will ease from there. Could I learn to trust governments if this works and we'll not have another spike and lockdown? We're receiving millions of vaccinations now, at least. It may be my turn in July. Progress?

In terms of the films and television I watched in Feb, I watched a little of New Girl and The Good Place. But alas, it looks like most TV is not for me.

It seems that most books are no longer for me, either. Am I too jaded, cynical and easily bored as I'm reaching thirty? I guess I've learned some hard lessons, that life is too short and unpredictable to read and/or view something you don't enjoy; that doesn't make you happy.

(I have read, or tried to read, Dash & Lily's Book of Dares and The Queen's Gambit. The Netflix shows are much better.)

I'll leave off this month's update by linking to the rereviews of the old books I've reread. You can read them if you wish.

Stay safe. Stay at home. And remember that you are loved. You matter. You have value. You are important.





The Tail of Emily Windsnap - Read review here.


The Dragon with a Chocolate Heart - Read review here.


Skellig - Read review here.


The Other Alice - Read review here.


The Goose Girl - Read review here.


Drink, Slay, Love - Read review here.


Annie on My Mind - Read review here.






A Gathering Light - Read review here.


Paradise Lost - Read review here.


Dracula - Read review here.





Sunday 7 February 2021

Book Review - 'Goldie Vance: The Hotel Whodunit' by Lilliam Rivera

2023 EDIT: I don't like the first 'Goldie Vance' comic volume anymore, so ignore when I praise it to high heavens here.

Back to the review:





I'd wanted to get into 'Goldie Vance' again, which is why I bought this novel version of an adventure (and I use that word extremely loosely) of hers. Sadly, I think that the first volume of the comic series is the only 'Goldie Vance' product that I can say I enjoyed greatly, because 'Goldie Vance: The Hotel Whodunit' turned out to be another disappointment (I wasn't hot on the second comic volume either).

First, I want to mention how utterly annoying and obnoxious Goldie Vance is in this book. Maybe the girl detective's thoughtlessness, total disregard for authority and responsibility, and borderline criminal acts translate better in a colourful and cartoony comic art form. But in how she is written here in prose, she is insufferable. It's not merely that she's an interminably nosy wannabe hotel sleuth, or a brownnoser. It's that she has as much tact, discreetness and stealth as a rhinoceros set loose in Buckingham Palace. Subtlety, quiet observation, secret-keeping, and modesty - vital components for a detective - are not Goldie's forte. She's like a spoiled, grabby little child in how she handles important things, like cars that belong to hotel guests (stealing cars is practically a hobby of hers!*), jewels, and other valuables. She has no business being involved in these matters to begin with. She's like the worst YA heroine, selfish and only exacerbating trouble, sometimes even starting it in the first place (but at least she's not obsessed with a hot guy).

She. Never. Shuts. Up. Too many times throughout reading I thought, "Oh lords, ladies and goddesses, please shut up already," at her. She's not helpful in any situation!

Goldie is almost a Mary Sue here. As well as being rich with no real problems**, she conveniently makes even very famous people like her and trust her immediately, enough to be friends in ten seconds. In fact, almost everybody loves her, and not enough people tell her to shut up or get lost, not even the movie industry people.

This is an actual line in the book: 'Distracted? Boy, is Mr. Maple wrong about me. I'm enthusiastic, aware, alert, smart, organized, and outgoing.' - page 87

Hint to authors: Show, don't tell. You're writing a story, not a noun grocery list. If at any time you feel you have to write down a character's supposed personality traits in your book that should have stayed in the character's profile sheet, made before the first draft writing process, then something needs to be corrected.

Moving on now to the mystery plot, such as it is. It revolves around a movie being set in Goldie's workplace and in her home, both in Florida - the Crossed Palms Resort Hotel, and the Mermaid Club, respectively. Basically, a theft will occur. Very late in the "plot".

But what I want to bring attention to, before anything else, is how unclear the book is at the beginning when it comes to what kind of film is being made. I mean, the hotel guests in sea monster costumes are introduced in literally the first lines in the first chapter, but with all the fuss and hustle and bustle and jewelled props and security being deployed, it seems like a big budget, Hollywood Oscar bait feature film. Or at least, it's something that's high profile, starring a world famous Hollywood actress, singer and dancer. But later on, it's revealed that it's actually a monster flick; a genre flick, made for fun and not typically requiring a budget that would bring in Hollywood royalty, extravagant sets and precious jewels (that, surprise, are stolen). It becomes a plot point that the famous actress (whom Goldie befriends long before the actual mystery starts) who stars as the leading lady, is considered by a few of her peers to be working far beneath her. That this isn't a "real film", by the actress's professional standards. But I'd thought that it was a real, important big budget film up until then. It was made to appear that way! Or is the criticism just snobbery, because the film is about mermaids and other sea creatures? I doubt it. It's inconsistent writing.

Other writing problems: So, when does the plot start? When does the mystery occur? When does anything significant actually happen?

At about page 145! Which is nearly 100 pages from the end! How do you get away with that? There's so much dithering around and padding in the beginning and middle. No wonder I got bored (as well as annoyed by Goldie) quickly.

Another thing that's stupid: The Crossed Palms Resort Hotel, which is gobsmackingly famous and ritzy, has a beehive on its property. Hotel beekeeper is a job there. Why the ever-loving, flock-me-Amadeus-Smith would a resort hotel have beehives?! That sounds exceedingly hazardous to me! I know I wouldn't want to stay at a hotel where there are swarms of bees around, and I would be anxious and unable to tell the difference between the buzzing of a heater and the other kind! Hotel beekeepers can apparently casually walk around in the lobby, in their suits, no commotion to be expressed! What do the staff tell the guests who are allergic to bee stings? Not good for business! The beehives could be where the resort receives its honey (it's never stated), but it's wealthy enough that it could afford to have honey imported from another source somewhere else!

Diane, Goldie Vance's love interest in the comics and cool chick extraordinaire, is barely in the book. She is literally on the sidelines the entre time, existing only to be admired from a distance occasionally by Goldie, to fuel her ask-her-out-already character development, which is hardly touched on. Diane doesn't do anything! She doesn't even have any lines until the final three pages! She plays no practical role in the story whatsoever. She might as well not exist. For an LBGTQ rep and relationship to be pushed far into a corner like this, it is disgraceful.

Speaking of wasted characters from the comics, Goldie's nemesis, Sugar Maple, is only mentioned once; she isn't in the story proper. Where is she? Her father, Mr. Maple the Crossed Palms owner, is present and prominent in the story, so why isn't she? Will she show up in the sequel? Conflict comes from the characters created for this book. Terrific.

Goldie also ends up easily trusting a tabloid reporter and prime suspect, called Scoops Malone (yes, really), who's a shady bastard if there ever was one. He sings her praises and inflates her already vast ego. Why?

Plot twist involving character relations being kept secret pointlessly for the sake of the mystery to work is pointless.

More pointlessness: The two comic inclusions, which are eight pages each of the familiar comic art depicting what is happening in the middle and near the end of the book, are unnecessary. Prose should remain prose, otherwise it's gimmicky and tacky. The comic pages' function is to remind me that I could be reading the first volume of the graphic novel series instead of the tedious and dumb novel.

Final negative criticism: I saved the worst till last. On page 26, Walter Tooley, the hotel's detective and longsuffering pushover for Goldie, says to her, "Mr. Maple, our boss, [...]". That line goes beyond the classic writing mistake of characters telling other characters what they should already know. At that point, the reader knows who Mr. Maple is. He's been mentioned. And oh yeah, Goldie hasn't just worked at the hotel for a while and should therefore know her boss's name, she's known him since she was at least six-years-old She was friends-to-enemies with his daughter! He was her dad's boss long before he was hers. It was at that moment in reading that I first fully realised 'Goldie Vance: The Hotel Whodunit' is an amateur novel, that should have gone through major proofreading before publication.

(Also, why were the actors staying at the resort always wearing their sea creature and mermaid costumes? Do they go out in public wearing them? Is there no costume and dress storage?)

A positive note I can give 'The Hotel Whodunit' is that it contains a character who is a high-power male movie executive, who is criticised for shouting a lot when things don't go his way, and is generally a corrupt, arrogant, chauvinistic jackass with more money than sense. He is castigated and mocked constantly. I'm sure this is meant to be a micro-representation of the #MeToo movement. It's watered down in order to fit in with children's lit sensibilities, but I appreciate the inclusion, nonetheless.

It's easy to picture the settings and the sights of Florida in the colourful and breezy descriptions. I like the mermaid and undersea aesthetic that comes with the Mermaid Club, and with the movie set. Introspective words of wisdom about Hollywood and what fame does to people are imparted a few times. Goldie's relationship with her mother, a mermaid actress, is nice, too - it's the only relationship in the whole book I genuinely believed in.

Overall, 'Goldie Vance: The Hotel Whodunit' is a boring, not-very-well-written and no-stakes book for me. It's a shame that I can't be excited about Goldie Vance's adventures anymore, or find her to be a worthy, competent teen girl sleuth. I'll stick to the first issues of the comics from now on.

Final Score: 2/5



*Technically, it's joyriding, what she does to guests' cars. It's not any better, nor does it negate the cars she steals in order to solve cases.

**No problems, despite her being a biracial lesbian in the 1960s. With divorced parents. In Florida. I suppose I could accept this nice escapism in the comics; not here, where the plot is so dumb and flat, as are the characters, that it makes it easier to nitpick.

Non-Fiction Book Review - 'Working on a Song: The Lyrics of Hadestown' by Anaïs Mitchell

I first heard about the musical 'Hadestown' only about eight months ago, from animatics on YouTube no less. I fell in love with the soundtrack instantly. The music and lyrics blew me away, as did the concept and characters, arisen from the underworld depths and mysteries of Greek Mythology. I dig the husky, smoky, 1920s US southwestern beatnik style. It is poetry I can get all aboard with, like the best train journey to the mining tunnels, because the characters are so powerfully defined and real. And it was written and directed by women.

I recently bought the new Broadway soundtrack album. Now I have bought and read 'Working on a Song: The Lyrics of Hadestown'; a book about the births of ideas, the deaths/discarding of ideas (called, affectionately, "orphans"), the new growths of old ideas (also orphans), the behind-the-scenes processes, the collaborations, the endless editing, the endless highs, the endless woes, the endless nights, the killing of your darlings, and other lyrical and staging changes that come with making a truly great musical, on- or off-Broadway.

Vitally, to go with all of that hardship and criticism that comes with a career in the creative field, it is about ambition and passion.

The experiences and advice given by the wonderful Anaïs Mitchell in 'Working on a Song' can be attributed to any kind of writing, not just song lyrics and poetry. It's the same continuous hard work, towards reaching an epiphany, reaching that revelatory word or line, in order to make it fit, to make it click, with its context; to put it as close to the unattainable concept of perfection as it can be. That marvellous, boundless, tireless human imagination!

It makes me realise how very important every word of dialogue is, in everything. There is so much to consider; so much thought needed in order to convey the right idea and impression upon an audience. It now amazes me, when I think of all the bad films and TV episodes that I've ever seen, those with jaw-droppingly horrible, terrible and WTF dialogue, and I have to wonder what the hell the writer and the hundreds of people working on the production were thinking to leave in that particular line and/or character action and motive, without thinking about the consequences; how it will effect and impact upon the rest of the film/episode. Granted, television works within very tight deadlines and other restraints, and neither it nor the film industry have the leeway to edit and experiment profoundly the way that musical theatre does, but caring is key.

In storytelling, everything is connected. There should be - must be - a connection. To an idea, and subsequently to the characters. The better to connect with the audience without it going tits up.

Every line of dialogue is important. Every detail counts when telling a story. Love all of the characters that you create, even the antagonists, so that you care to make sure that your audience will fall in love with them as well.

'Working on a Song' is a rich and satisfying read for any 'Hadestown' fan, and theatre fan. I read it all in one night, when I didn't think I would. I finished it just after midnight. While, in my opinion, it could have been longer, in expounding on more details about the creative process and the song lyric changes, it is a triumph as it is. Like 'Hadestown' itself, it is something that's so seemingly simple, but is full to the wine goblet brim with creativity, introspection, and heart.

Also, I will never get tired of hearing Amber Gray say "It ain't right, it ain't natural". Actually, I will never get tired of hearing Amber Gray say anything, period. Same goes for André De Shields and Patrick Page. And every girl (including Anaïs Mitchell!) who plays the rhapsodical and indefatigable Eurydice.

Final Score: 4/5

Saturday 6 February 2021

Book Review - 'The Queen's Nose' by Dick King-Smith

2024 EDIT: Reread in an afternoon, and I have to say, 'The Queen's Nose' has a much darker ending than I remembered. How did I not notice all these implications the first time reading it? There are layers and subtext to this deceptively simple little classic children's book about wishes and animals (dare I say, it could intentionally be about British-and-Indian relations/colonialism, too!?). Though a lot of classic children's books are dark, on rereading them as an adult, aren't they? Just look at the bibliography of Beatrix Potter.

'The Queen's Nose' does have a "Be careful what you wish for" message without outright stating it. It's done in a process, as the reader learns alongside the protagonist, Harmony, as she makes progress or doesn't; learns from her mistakes or doesn't. And at least this piece of lit about a tomboyish young heroine doesn't end with her suddenly being into "girly" things and only caring about boys, as so many male (and female, unfortunately) authors for too long have been under the mistaken assumption that that's "character growth" and "maturity" for girls.

Recommended for a short, sweet, simple - if eerie - time.

Final Score: 3.5/5





Original Review:



'The Queen's Nose' is a sweet little book for children that can be read in a couple of hours. Animal fans are sure to like it, as well as people who like to make-believe, to wish for things that they hope will come true, and to go out and play and explore and ride their bike and do all sorts of things to keep fit and healthy. Never mind how dirty and raggedy you may get!

The characters have such lovely names - Harmony, Melody, Uncle Ginger, and all the people who ten-year-old Harmony names after different animals, based on their appearance and conduct.

Harmony Parker is a rapscallion tomboy (a sexist, patronising and outdated term, but back in the eighties she would be described as such), and I adore her for it. She is desperate for a pet - lots of pets, in fact - but her parents won't let her have any animals. Her Uncle Ginger leaves after a visit to the family, with a present for Harmony: a treasure hunt, which leads to a fifty-pence coin, found under a wooden tea chest in her favourite place - the disused chicken house at the end of her garden.

The fifty-pence coin, that Uncle Ginger apparently got from India, is magic; with a magic Queen's head, with her pointed nose, on one side of it. It can grant its owner seven wishes.

How the young girl will go about wishing for things is up to her. Her wishing will eventually end up with unexpected, and twisted, results for her and her family.

'The Queen's Nose' can be endearing, unpredictable, and life-affirming.

A few downsides to the book are: once Harmony receives her pets, not much attention is paid to them, after all of her longing; and her mother and older sister Melody are rather stereotypical - a fussy, old-fashioned housewife and an overly-feminine, shallow, self-absorbed and mean teenage girl respectively - but they do soften up and show more dimension towards the end of the novella.

I enjoyed 'The Queen's Nose'. I haven't really read any other books by Dick King-Smith (I've never been that interested in fiction books about animals, as fond as I am of them). I know, however, that this one is a certified children's classic. It is also very different from what I barely remember of the BBC TV series that I saw as a little kid.

Final Score: 3.5/5

Wednesday 3 February 2021

Book Review - 'Lucía the Luchadora' by Cynthia Leonor Garza (Writer), Alyssa Bermudez (Illustrator)

'Lucía the Luchadora' is a wonderfully fun action picture book/comic for kids.

It's about luchadoras, luchadores, and lucha libre - the awesome Mexican wrestling and acrobatic tradition, and its history (luchadoras and luchadores are like real life superheroes! and they do get involved in social justice). It's about gender equality, and it's high-power entertainment! The art is adorable, dazzling and fabulous!

Though, does anyone seriously still believe that girls can't be superheroes? 'Lucía the Luchadora' was published in 2017. I'd say that superheroines in the mass pop culture media were more than fairly common back then! Only internet trolls, misogynists and young boys with terrible parents would think that girls and women can't be heroes.

That girls and women can't be whatever the hell they want.

The book could have given us more of the masked cat in the past, and the masked dog in the present, too.

But it's all colourful and exciting stuff! And hooray for diversity!


'A luchadora has moxie. She is brave and full of heart, and isn't afraid to fight for what is right.'


Lucía the Luchadora - the superheroine that kids need.

A big hug for 'Lucía the Luchadora'!

Final Score: 4/5